this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
-9 points (39.0% liked)
World News
32068 readers
1197 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Much safer than getting massacred by Russians.
Much more dangerous than negotiating a ceasefire.
With who? Russia? Lmao. Fuck that. Shoot them all and drive them back into that cesspool they call a county.
How many dead Ukrainians is Luhansk and Donetsk worth? How many dead Ukrainians is it worth to thrash against a multipolar world for another couple years? Fifty thousand? A hundred? Two? The price doesn't really matter to the beneficiaries, the beneficiaries aren't the ones to pay for it, but it's a good question to think about nonetheless. I personally want fewer dead Ukrainians, but you're entitled to your own feelings too.
I personally don't want to see Ukraine carved up like a turkey. Fuck off with your concern trolling.
Well, seeing at the beneficiaries are Ukraine, yes it would be worth it. I know you're either paid to believe or have been huffing the glue that is the reasoning posted on lemmygrad, hopefully you'll recover your morals or your senses one day.
edit: For reference to the glue sniffing
Safer than negotiating a ceasefire as a theory, maybe. Safer than negotiating a ceasefire with the RF? No.
Your one correct statement in this thread: Negotiating a peace with Russians is more dangerous than anything that happens in the war zone