this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2025
2235 points (99.2% liked)
Technology
68244 readers
4136 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm retired and doing hobby projects in Python and java, so I get choices (including not playing) but wtf, big tech figured out how to take over open source?
That's particularly evil.
Python's creator and BDfL works at Microsoft.
I'm not trying to be like some HOLY MOUNTAIN that no unclean things can ever touch.
I'm just trying to keep myself free. I'll use people's stuff. If that starts becoming bondage, I'm out
A cynical explanation would be using the EEE theory to explain all of this.
A more nuanced one would be that corporations benefit from open source since it creates an easier pipeline to onboard engineers and they also benefit from the free labor that people put into the projects out of passion. Whether they want to kill OSS after embracing it is debatable, but they definitely want to have as much leverage on it as possible.
That Wikipedia is a gold mine of evil.
They can support these languages because they have the resources to do so.
I feel like a good illustration would be a bicycle.
Is that about right? Are we selling open source for speed and convenience?