this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2025
169 points (95.2% liked)

science

17557 readers
159 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca -2 points 3 days ago (4 children)

IIUC, quantum entanglement at a distance provides for faster than light/instant communication of state changes. High frequency trading, and dark orderbooks, is the only known economic application (space communications a far off application). I'm not sure why article avoided talking about this purpose.

[–] SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

You don't understand correctly. Entangled particles do not allow for faster than light communication.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

While the entangled photons may be thought of as changing state simultaneously, in practice, it's not possible to use this to convey information, as doing so would break causality, and effect would be able to happen before its cause. Remember that what is commonly termed 'the speed of light' is actually better expressed as 'the speed of causality'. The most useful application of what this experiment performed would be in the area of quantum cryptography.

[–] Bear_pile@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So honest question here:

Why can't it be used to transmit information? Wouldn't we be able to capture the state and use that be turned into instructions the same way we use binary currently?

Binary is essentially just a series of "on" and "off" states that we capture and translate into instructions, so why can't we do that with entangled particles? Like position 6 translates into instructions F and position 2 triggers instructions B.

I know this is overly simplified but I do not follow that we can't send information this way when looking at it through this lense.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Watch these videos that explain the answer. Basically, the problem is that you can only use this to convey random information , which would be indistinguishable from not sending anything at all.

https://youtu.be/0xI2oNEc1Sw

https://youtu.be/BLqk7uaENAY

[–] peteyestee@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

So you're telling me my Bitcoin is quantum now?

/S

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago

that's not how that works, quantum entanglement can not be used to transmit information and thus doesn't violate causality

[–] xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago

it doesn’t work like that