this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2025
2 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22539 readers
451 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to The Labour Community.

Take any slop posts to the slop trough

Main is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

My only concern with this is whether or not it will result in China expanding its influence until it reaches capacity.

Once China expands to its maximum capacity it will then be possible to stretch the country. One of the reasons the US has been unable to fuck with it much has been because it is operating with considerable room to spare in order to elastically deal with issues.

If I were going to build a campaign against China, I think my starting point would be to invite China to maximise its capabilities, to use them all up on all things. Then upon reaching those limits you would be able to start fucking with it in a way that causes real problems. You genuinely can't do anything against China while it has heaps of spare capacity.

[–] jack@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

USAID had a $36B budget. China could absolutely deliver as much aid at a far lower cost due to both socialist efficiency and not spending most of the budget on imperialism. And China has a $1T trade surplus.

I think it's pretty much impossible for this to stretch the PRC too thin.

[–] PPBelisarius@hexbear.net 1 points 6 days ago

It’s cheaper to cause problems than to solve them. That being said, I agree with despite that.