this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
1 points (50.5% liked)

Technology

34904 readers
259 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A couple hours before I was on the edge of getting a Fairphone 5 but I read the specifications and didn't see 3.5 mm audio jack anywhere. So I thought to myself...why? The community has been requesting this for a couple years ago now so why not. They're already making money on the phone, they're really pushing for people to get their wireless headphones? Just add the headphone jack, shouldn't be too hard.

They said they're treating their workers fairly, sourcing from ethical sources, renewable claims, repairability claims, and supporting foss projects (they donated a fp4 to CalyxOS to support development). All of these are amazing, so adding a little headphone jack shouldn't be that hard in the grand scheme of all this.

*Add the headphone jack and I'll be happy to support and get a fp5.

https://calyxos.org/news/2022/02/25/device-support/

https://shop.fairphone.com/fairphone-5

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] falkerie71@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It would seem so, but it's also arguable that by removing the port, you are forcing customers to buy wireless headphones that are much more harmful to the environment, something that goes against their motto of eco-friendliness.

[–] HKayn@dormi.zone 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can still use an adapter! Who is forcing you to buy wireless headphones???

[–] falkerie71@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why not no adapters in the first place? They are still an extra thing to carry, not to mention how easy it is to lose or break them.

[–] HKayn@dormi.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can't imagine that being too much of a hassle when the adapter is affixed to your wired earbuds which you already carry.

[–] falkerie71@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Can't speak for other people, but I myself have multiple IEMs, and would use it on my phone and PC. The dongle would not be fixed at all times in my example.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess I care more about workers and fair trade, but that's a fair point. Wired earbuds are just copper whereas wireless use lithium and whatever minerals Bluetooth requires.

[–] falkerie71@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Don't mind the downvotes. Fair trade and eco-friendliness are both important, but sometimes you can't get both. Gray area exists, and I don't judge anyone who places one before another. Provided they understand both of course.