this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
128 points (95.1% liked)

Asklemmy

43822 readers
891 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I know this will vary a lot, so hypothetically let’s say you currently WFH/work remotely at least 3 days a week. Your commute to work takes an hour max (door to door) each way. If you were given the choice of a 4 day week working onsite, or a 5 day week WFH (or as many days as you’d like) for the same pay, which would you choose?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KHTangent@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

4 days on-site. I like the mental separation by having a completely separate space for work, and I enjoy talking to my colleagues. I don't see many people outside of work, so I need the social interaction. And the lunches at work are usually much healthier than something I'd cook up myself, so that's also a plus.

I have tried to work from home a few days, but don't really like it at all.

[–] SomeoneElse@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

I remember at the start of the first lockdown there were a bunch of young people in flat shares that really really struggled because the only private place they had to work was their bedrooms. I can definitely understand why people might like to work in the office for that reason and reasons like your own.

[–] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gross. You needy people sicken me.

[–] KHTangent@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sorry for having an opinion different than yours. I am not even saying that WFH is bad or anything, just that I don't prefer it.

[–] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not your opinion that's bad, it's being so needy that you feel you need to be around people all the time. That makes you one of those people that feed on the energy of others, which is harmful to them. Gross.

[–] KHTangent@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

By talking to others, I'm feeding on their energy? I never said that I forcefully disturb others so they have to talk to me or something. I just enjoy the casual day-to-day chats with my coworkers.

But if calling strangers gross on the internet makes you feel good, I hope you have a lovely day.

[–] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They are your co-workers, not your friends. Running in to you at the coffee machine does not mean they care to go through the meaningless idle chit chat that means nothing but is a waste of time. If you make actual friends at work, fine, they probably welcome you. Otherwise, you're just another person we are all forced to tolerate to get through another terrible day. Worse, your desire to come in helps legitimize the push to force people back to the office. So that's butt kissing, if you don't like seeing yourself as a social vampire. But the main point here is, we go to see our friends. At an office, we are forced together. In a forced setting like that, more often then not, your desire to talk can be taxing and a waste of time to everyone else. You want to talk? Do it with your friends, your family. Leave everyone else the hell alone.

[–] KHTangent@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That seems like a very depressing mindset to have. And don't generalize your view onto everyone else like that. You say this as if I'm forcing everyone else at work to talk to me, which I am not. I am not even the one to initiate most conversations.

[–] PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you set an example of wanting to be in the office, that will be expected of the rest of us... so yes, it kind of is forcing everyone else, if not to talk to you, at least to be in the office. That puts you on management's side of the war. No thank you.

[–] KHTangent@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I actually work in a company where anyone can work from home if they want. It's just that many of us chose not to for various reasons.

So I'm sorry for having a preference different than yours, but if your management uses me as a single example to keep people in the office against their will, I think that's s problem with the management, not with me.

Wow, you are so sure of yourself. Your needing others can’t possibly be the problem. Ok. Glad you don’t work for us.