this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
1095 points (97.8% liked)

Harry Potter

948 readers
2 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I think the movies in particular do a poor job showing how hard the snitch is supposed to be to catch. Games literally went on for days according to the books because the seekers weren't pro-level generational talents like Harry.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Doesn't that kinda enforce the point that the rule/function is stupid?

[–] Sludgeyy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No because they need a way to end the game

Time limit is a solution, but it's not the only one. Time limit would change the game so much.

Do you want basketball on broomsticks or Quidditch?

In Quidditch, you can have a strategy of never scoring a goal but just playing keep away until your team catches the snitch. It's risky but could be a strategy.

Time limit would be the better team scoring a couple goals and playing keepaway.

You could add shot clocks...

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

I think she was always shooting for 'surreal'. She was pretty successful at it in many WW aspects, but it seems she missed the mark on a few subjects, especially sports and competition.

[–] SgtAStrawberry@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Wasn't there also at least one famus game that went on for a few years.

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Imagine if he could actually see!