this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2025
805 points (78.2% liked)

Memes

49685 readers
1141 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blinx615@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I support the alternatives up until election day when I have to accept reality and not throw my vote away. Truth is if everyone voted for their ideal candidate, we'd end up with 50 parties each getting 2% of the vote... There's always more ways to split. You have to compromise somewhere if you're going to vote at all.

[–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Then you don't actually support the alternatives.

[–] blinx615@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Then you don't actually care who gets elected

[–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If elections matter, shouldn't you vote for the person/party you supposedly support?

[–] blinx615@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

You decrease the value of your vote when you write in yourself every time. Do you really have to agree with 100% of what anyone says? I'd have to write myself in if that was true.

[–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No one is making the argument that you have to agree 100% with whatever politician/party you're voting for.

And where on earth did you get the "write in yourself" thing from, that's an even more ridiculous strawman.

[–] blinx615@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You have failed to make any effort at explaining yourself so Idk why I should.

[–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Believe it or not, but there are more than two parties that run candidates in US presidential elections.

This shouldn't need to be explained to you.

[–] blinx615@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Of course there are. And if you want your vote to be useless, you can vote for them.

[–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They'll win if people vote for them.

[–] blinx615@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

More of this low effort trash, gtfo

[–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] blinx615@lemmy.ml 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Our electoral system is trash, designed in a way that disproportionately favors groups willing to compromise and coalesce behind a single candidate. If we split the vote by voting our conscience while the "other side" consolidates behind a single candidate, we're at a serious disadvantage. The core issue is how the public is ignorant, or worse, misinformed and confident (made easier by ignorance). This is a failure of our education system, a system that's been declining for decades. Not a lot I can do, I was born into this.

As just one cog in the machine, my power is limited. If I see a close race between two candidates, with others trailing far behind, I'm compelled to compromise for what I believe is the better outcome. If you prioritize supporting a third party, or if you genuinely see both leading candidates as equally shit, then by all means, vote third party. We all have our priorities. However, I do resent being judged for making pragmatic compromises to cause some change, as mild as it may be.

[–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The important thing is that you have a convenient excuse. Godspeed.

[–] blinx615@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

You're just too dumb, it's ok

[–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 1 points 7 hours ago

Sure. All the best in your future endeavours.