this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2025
101 points (99.0% liked)

UK Politics

3646 readers
76 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A British Transport Police spokesperson said: “Under previous policy, we had advised that someone with a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC) may be searched in accordance with their acquired sex, however as an interim position while we digest yesterday’s judgement, we have advised our officers that any same sex searches in custody are to be undertaken in accordance with the biological birth sex of the detainee.

“We are in the process of reviewing the implications of the ruling and will consider any necessary updates to our policies and practices in line with the law and national guidance.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheDanjinSpear@lemmy.world -3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You literally only have taking points from every extreme leftist argument ever.

Get over yourself.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

This isn't my talking point, it's yours.

This is the inevitable result of defining sex based on people's birth certificates.

You are demanding that these guys be required to use the stall next to your daughter because you're afraid of men in women's bathrooms. Because you can't allow yourself to consider the implications of applying your rule to messy, complicated, ambiguous reality.

You are the kind of person that would go into a women's room and accost a woman because you thought she was a man. You are what you fear.

[–] TheDanjinSpear@lemmy.world -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] knightly@pawb.social 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Prove it.

Explain how your preferred method of deciding who belongs in which bathroom doesn't mandate putting people like that in the women's room. Prove to me that there are no manly women.