this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
687 points (95.5% liked)

Technology

58115 readers
3903 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bioemerl@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

forcing AI models to have a signature that is guaranteed to be indentifiable, permanent, and unique for each tuning produced

Either AI remains entirely in the hands of fucks like open AI or this is impossible and easily removed. AI should be a free common use tool, not an extension of corporate control.

[–] stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Agreed, such power should belong to everyone or has yet to be discovered. Even Oppenheimer knew, once the cats out of the bag…

[–] roguetrick@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Owning the means of AI production huh? I guess anarchists will win after all.

[–] bioemerl@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

It's no different than owning your computer. Something is absolutely a central and productivity boosting is artificial intelligence should not be kept in the hands of the few.

The only way that it could be is through government intervention, you don't need an anarchist to be against an open AI monopoly.