this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2023
94 points (98.0% liked)

ErgoMechKeyboards

5686 readers
26 users here now

Ergonomic, split and other weird keyboards

Rules

Keep it ergo

Posts must be of/about keyboards that have a clear delineation between the left and right halves of the keyboard, column stagger, or both. This includes one-handed (one half doesn't exist, what clearer delineation is that!?)

i.e. no regular non-split¹ row-stagger and no non-split¹ ortholinear²

¹ split meaning a separation of the halves, whether fixed in place or entirely separate, both are fine.
² ortholinear meaning keys layed out in a grid

No Spam

No excessive posting/"shilling" for commercial purposes. Vendors are permitted to promote their products/services but keep it to a minimum and use the [vendor] flair. Posts that appear to be marketing without being transparent about it will be removed.

No Buy/Sell/Trade

This subreddit is not a marketplace, please post on r/mechmarket or other relevant marketplace.

Some useful links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It's not done yet, but I figured I'd show off a little bit since I have been using this for a few weeks now. This is the "swirl". It's heavily inspired by the helix with some notable changes:

  • mbk Choc Spacing (Dimensions are about 12.5cm x 8.5cm on either half)
  • Reversible roller encoders on the top inner switch

https://github.com/vmorganp/swirl

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Looks awesome! Why use two boards and the trrs cable? Couldn't you use one board and the cable? Or can each of the two halves be used independently of one another?

[–] dnzm@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Because this allows you to keep the halves further apart, which is considered more ergonomical.

Typically, each half can, in fact, be used independently (they each have their own microcontroller).

[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

why cords? why not two separate wireless devices?

[–] dnzm@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because then things like holding shift on one half and a letter on the other wouldn't work.

[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

if those issues could be solved by software drivers would the cord free aesthetic be preferred?

[–] KeyboardGoesBrrr@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

In a perfect world, yeah totally. I could use controllers that are approximately twice the price (nice!nanos) and have to rewrite the firmware (qmk -> zmk) and deal with Bluetooth, or I could just use wires and have it "just work™". I personally prefer this, but tons of people go the wireless route.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)