437
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Afghanistan was a just action. Let's just get that settled.

Iraq was legal but the public was lied to about the justification.

War Crimes requires a nation to purposefully target and kill civilians. If such an illegal order occurs those responsible are charged. If a government does not charge those issuing illegal orders they can be charged with War Crimes.

Civilian deaths do occur in War, a nation must only target legal military targets. For example the World Trade Center was an illegal target on 9/11. The Pentagon was a legal target on 9/11. Attacking a Civilian office gave the United States legal rights to retaliation.

As for Bush, his actions didn't violate international law in Iraq. They were questionable and diplomacy would have been the better option, but still not illegal. All acts deemed War Crimes had those responsible charged and sent to prison. For example those responsible for the Abu Ghraib incident were charged, convicted, and sentenced to prison. The person to ordered the abuse and torture of prisoners was William Hayes II, General Council of the Department of Defense and authorized by Judge Brett Kavanagh, yes the same one that now serves on the Supreme Court.

Bonus, Ron DeSantis was responsible for authorizing torture at Guantanamo Bay.

If you want to charge people with War Crimes, start with the three who still are at-large from justice.

[-] drolex@sopuli.xyz 5 points 9 months ago

"Afghanistan was a just action". Was it really? Is it justice to invade a country and kill civilians for an act of terrorism, even a massive one? Should the Latin american countries where the CIA operated, installed dictatorships and helped to kill thousands, bomb the USA? Wasn't it foreign terrorism? Should Vietnam invade the USA for its use of Agent orange and napalm? Would it be just?

[-] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Do you think the US invaded Afghanistan with the goal to kill civilians?

[-] drolex@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 months ago

That's the neat part: nobody is a civilian when you define everyone as an unlawful combatant.

But otherwise, every war ever fought has killed civilians; so starting a war is automatically about killing civilians at some point. Stating that it's not the main goal is hypocritical

[-] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Do you think the US should have just left Bin Laden to 'do his thing'? Do you think religious terrorist can be stopped without using violence?

[-] drolex@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 months ago

Well they did let him do his thing (unknowingly). They even trained him... But after that, I think they shouldn't have invaded a country for him. Otherwise where do you stop? Do the US bomb Texas every time there is a Christian bomber?

[-] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Do you believe Texas is going to refuse to extradite a christian terrorist that's attacked New York?

this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
437 points (90.4% liked)

No Stupid Questions

34309 readers
2128 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS