this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2025
56 points (95.2% liked)

Open Source

38524 readers
164 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/31859998

Please see the cross-post as it is updated.

As a security-conscious user, I've used NoScript since Firefox's early days, but its restrictive nature has become frustrating. I'm often forced to go unprotected just to access websites with multiple scripts running on different domains, which defeats the purpose of using NoScript and balances security and usability that it once provided.

Is there a way to block browser JavaScript from executing commands that retrieve sensitive information from my local machine, while still allowing JavaScript that is only used for rendering web pages?

greatly appreciate any insight

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/31859998

Please see the cross-post as it is updated.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] happeningtofry99158@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (9 children)

by sensitive information I'm referring to

  • local machine time
  • local machine ram
  • local machine operating system + version
  • local machine hardware
  • Serial Number
  • Hardware ID
  • UUID
  • Windows Device ID
  • Windows Product ID
  • ...

Can I prevent javascript from running specific command that retrieve these information?

I found chameleon which spoof local machine operating system + version and browser information. But I'm not sure about other information

[–] copygirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Can you link to a source that confirms this information can be collected with JavaScript (with browser comparison, ideally)? That seems outrageous if it was actually possible.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)