this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2025
-1 points (45.5% liked)

Positive News

225 readers
83 users here now

A community centered on positive news from all over the world.

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CanadianCorhen@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Very dubious of this technology. It would take an insane amount of energy to spin it up, a near perfect vacuum, and put incredible stress (something like 10k G's!) on whatever is being accelerated. On top of that, it would have the most velocity at the lowest elevation, where the atmosphere is thickest.

I would love to hear that they make it work, but wouldn't put my money behind it.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Not only that, but you need to accelerate at or near apogee in order to achieve orbit or your path will be ballistic and you're going to hit the ground again. That's a fact of physics that can't be changed. Something without an engine or fuel can't do that.

[–] CanadianCorhen@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

the package could definitely include a small booster engine to circleize its orbit, but that would add more complexity.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

It also invalidates their "without a drop of fuel" claim.