this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
126 points (93.2% liked)

World News

32292 readers
655 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zephyreks@programming.dev -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah yes, because escalation has worked so well in the past.

[–] Kata1yst@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And what do you propose a sovereign nation who's citizens, business, and assets are constantly under attack from state sponsored actors do? Bend over?

This isn't escalation. It's minimal tit-for-tat.

[–] zephyreks@programming.dev -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Constantly under attack? Remember that even back when the KMT was in power, Chiang Kai-Shek was (rightfully) suspicious that the CIA was plotting a coup to overthrow him.

Moreover, when the CCP was rising with Mao Zedong, the CIA used something like $100 million USD at the time to try to create a third group in China that could combat the other two (the KMT and CCP) with the explicit goal of undermining Mao's power.

China's existing actions don't even come close to tit-for-tat and America's continued subversive actions show that nothing has changed whatsoever. The US still thinks it can fuck around in the domestic affairs of other countries and leave unscathed without retribution.