this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2025
130 points (100.0% liked)

Open Source

38827 readers
95 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I think they are bundling this into their regular app, so they'd have to put every guardian read on the listπŸ˜…

[–] JadedBlueEyes@programming.dev 5 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Yep, that's the point described in the linked paper - traffic goes via the same domains used for their app, and the messenger is embedded in their app

[–] irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Not only that, but every app will constantly appear to be sending messages, so real messages are greatly obfuscated. That's honestly the real innovative part of the product IMHO.

[–] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

that's really cool. Does the message part work as regular p2p message app?

[–] irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No it's a bit complex. The transmissions are sent constantly at regular intervals and are a very specific size and are then combined later. So it's not "instant" messaging. It's closer to email.

[–] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

So encrypted, periodical interval to mask out any incoming/out going variance in traffic I wonder how they mitigate the backend part as there might be a ton of wasted traffic to hide the actual traffic. since they obviously need a lot of users to hide the whistle blower, but that also mean their backend needs to be pretty smart to handle lots of traffic and still consume energy to decrypt and then throw away the "noise" data.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)