this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
47 points (100.0% liked)

Cybersecurity

7804 readers
145 users here now

c/cybersecurity is a community centered on the cybersecurity and information security profession. You can come here to discuss news, post something interesting, or just chat with others.

THE RULES

Instance Rules

Community Rules

If you ask someone to hack your "friends" socials you're just going to get banned so don't do that.

Learn about hacking

Hack the Box

Try Hack Me

Pico Capture the flag

Other security-related communities !databreaches@lemmy.zip !netsec@lemmy.world !securitynews@infosec.pub !cybersecurity@infosec.pub !pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub

Notable mention to !cybersecuritymemes@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 weeks ago (14 children)

They still need help upgrading the key exchange to be quantum resistant if anyone needs a summer project.

[–] LodeMike 4 points 2 weeks ago (13 children)

No they don't "need" help doing that. Quantum resistance is kind of a waste of time considering the largest number factored by these things is 21.

And the known algorithm we halve just square roots the search space on average. So a 256 bit key is still secure. Quantum resistance just seems like another industry scam to try and take us away from well supported open-source stuff.

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

It's also not that hard to implement. It's just a slightly different algorithm.

Also it's not an industry scam - literally the only standard out so far is from NIST.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)