Technology

59440 readers

3476 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

1090

Update: Unity office death threat was made by a Unity employee (www.polygon.com)

submitted 1 year ago by ram@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world

151 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/5340114

ghostarchive
Original Discussion^[https://lemmy.world/post/5057297]

San Francisco police told Polygon that officers responded to Unity’s San Francisco office “regarding a threats incident.” A “reporting party” told police that “an employee made a threat towards his employer using social media.” The employee that made the threat works in an office outside of California, according to the police statement.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] HKayn@dormi.zone 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Then why don't they look for work at another company?

Making death threats is still a major dick move regardless of the circumstances.

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It is, but all we have right now is Unity's claim that this is what happened. We don't even know the content of the threat, who made it, why they made it. All of that context could cast this in a wildly different light. I am very suspicious of Unity the company's motives here in saying this when we haven't heard from anyone else.

[–] snek@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I think it was the police who found out it was an employee.

[+] HKayn@dormi.zone -6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How can this be cast in any light that's not negative?

Companies don't just make up death threats.

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They absolutely do when it benefits them and they think they can get away with it, I don't know how you could make such a blanket claim without questioning yourself just a little bit.

And of course it would be negative, but I think there's a chance the claim casts a negative light on the company, and not on the employee, who is as yet unnamed. As it stands now, any of the following could be true:

The entire story is fiction, made up by Unity to distract from literally everything else about them. Distractions are massively important to companies at times like this, and it's almost like clockwork that you find them making up distractions when they can't find a way to put a good spin on the press.
There's a real employee who posted something on social media, and it was a death threat. The death threat was about the current news. Bad employee, hope they see some consequences. I am doubting this right now because we don't have any actual evidence of it, and because of point (1). Furthermore, the vagueness of this press announcement and the fact that "you wouldn't know him, he works in another state" gives them cover . . .
There's a real employee who posted something negative on social media. It was not a death threat, and is being deliberately misconstrued by Unity to allow them to deploy point (1).
There's a real death threat posted on social media by someone who sucks. That person is not, in fact, a Unity employee and the announcement to the contrary was either deliberate misinformation or a simple mistaken identity. IDK what this would say about the company, but gamers can be real shitty. If this one is the case, I hope that person sees consequences, but they probably won't.
There's a real post on social media framed as a death threat, deliberately planted by someone at Unity to create a distraction, see point (1).

There's more, and quite frankly it gets tiresome to see people jumping to defend when ploys like this have been the playbook for shitty companies since the invention of the company. I don't know which of these things will be turn out to be true, but neither do you, and it's so boring to see someone claiming they know the facts here for sure.

[–] ram@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

They literally do though to steer the conversation to one wherein they're a sympathetic figure. Never hear of PR?

[–] TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It might have been wiser, but seems to me we got to a point we should be thinking of the circumstances.

Besides, that only would have solved their individual problem, IF they even managed it. The way the company is being run would remain the same. How it would impact all the people who rely on that engine would remain the same.

It's "never acceptable" to threaten someone, but intentionally ruining countless people's livelihoods is "nothing personal". Something is off about that.

[–] HKayn@dormi.zone 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can't just solve a company's culture by yourself.

You can either convince enough people to unionize, or you can save yourself.

[–] TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Agreed but I can still understand the frustration.