this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2025
362 points (97.9% liked)

United States | News & Politics

8254 readers
721 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Relevant rant:
๐Ÿ“บ Why the Democratic Party CANNOT and WILL NOT be Reformed
Democrats would rather lose to a Republican, to a conservative, to a fascist, to Trump, than address the material conditions of the American people.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 week ago (9 children)

To be clear, all socialism is democratic. "Democratic Socialism" is just for reformist socialism, and I'd argue Mamdani is just to give New Yorkers a taste of what a better world could look like. You can't actually change capitalism by working within it, though, revolution remains necessary. Mamdani could prove beneficial in normalizing socialism.

[โ€“] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Traditionally yes, but the Democratic Socialists of America, as an organization (and of which Mamdani is a member), has a wide array of internal ideological factions within, that include Reformist Socialists, but also more revolutionary factions like Anarchists, Trotskyists, Marxist-Leninists, etc.

[โ€“] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Sure, and I'd say this fracturing and factionalism works against its effectiveness. Democratic Centralism works.

[โ€“] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't disagree, but I think it's worth recognizing that when we talk about the DSA, that it is, for better or worse more than just a reformist org.

[โ€“] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

When people speak of Democratic Socialism, they usually are referring to the ideological position, not just the USian party, for what it's worth. That's my point, I'm aware of Red Star caucus and whatnot.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)