this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
95 points (97.0% liked)
Asklemmy
49232 readers
860 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It will be fully automated. You mark the position and time, an AI checks the record and the thief will be punished. No police nor judge needed.
Doesn't really keep my bike where I expect it to be, though, does it? So what does all that violation of human rights actually buy us?
Once all thieves are 'treated', who should move a bike?
Violated humans. Political stability by removing all dissidents.
I am not arguing for surveillance, I just assume that it will come.
just parroting the talking point of those who are?
Why should it not happen? If they track everybody crime becomes impossible, as does dissent. The latter is the motivation, the former, as you say, the talking point. Not looking forward to it, but political development suggests that it will happen.