this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
16 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

3108 readers
140 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

In theory, this seems like a reasonable approach, E cores take less space and are more power efficient; but what will the ST performance be like for the Titan Lake E cores? You still need ST performance, a lot of use cases will never be fully parallel.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you’re buying a 100 core cpu you’re accounting for ST performance

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I believe the statement about 100 cores was just an example and not actually part of the roadmap.