this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2025
1139 points (98.1% liked)

Memes

51714 readers
1410 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] killingspark@feddit.org 30 points 2 days ago (68 children)

I swear my uncle is a good landlord. Keeps prices low, I swear he doesn't rip off his renters. He would never do that.

If there were as many good landlords as I have heard this story we wouldn't have any problems Kyle, sit the fuck back down.

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 52 points 2 days ago (51 children)

Assuming this comment isn't ironic: there is no such thing as a good landlord. Landlords are parasitic middlemen who live by leeching off the value created by workers. They contribute no value whatsoever.

This is admitted even in mainstream economics, its termed rent-seeking.

[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (32 children)

there is no such thing as a good landlord.

Okay, I'll bite. I just bought a 4-bed/3-bath (actually 4 bathrooms, but bathroom math made it "3-bath") because we are a family of four in an expensive tourist spot and wanted a guest bedroom for family and visitors. It just so happened one bed and a 3/4 bathroom is in an attached 1-bedroom apartment with its own kitchen and living room.

So when I retire, and my oldest is out of the house to college, we are thinking we could rent that particular part (at a very reasonable rate to people we know). It is part of the house, so I can't sell it separately. So the choice is be a landlord, or don't offer housing (I suppose I could make it an AirBnB and make even more money, but this area is already fucked for housing for that reason).

So if there is no such thing as a good landlord, what would you recommend in a situation like this? Let someone live there for free? Then they'd be costing me money. Don't rent it out? AirBnB?

[–] Bluetooth@feddit.dk 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Downsize when you don’t need the space anymore? Would be my guess.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

A lot of kids move back after college. I definitely wouldn't downsize until my family was secure and for sure no longer needed the space.

Now the question is it better to allow that space sit vacant or rent out the space.

I think there is a defensible position for renting out a temporarily unused space in your primary home versus buying vacant properties solely to rent.

[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

First, that doesn't solve the problem because then somebody else has two units in one building.

Second, downsize... from a four bed to a three bed? Not sure what sense that makes. Our needs won't have changed dramatically.

Another piece that I didn't mention is that I'm in the military, in a place with 3-year tours (so fairly temporary), and the young single people who arrive usually don't wany anything too permanent, and are not in a position to buy. But I do know what their allowance for housing it, so I would be able to charge less than their allowance for housing, meaning they would get money out of the deal (and stuff is expensive here, so I'm not sure how they live anyway), and I get a respectful, reliable tenant (and we could offer home-cooked meals to whoever stays).

I know it's a unique circumstance, and an exception hardly disproves the rule, but I don't think "there's no such thing as a good landlord" is a true blanket statement.

[–] autriyo@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

Moving is kinda stressful though, but if you can manage that downsizing would probably be the right call.

load more comments (28 replies)
load more comments (46 replies)
load more comments (62 replies)