this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2025
140 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

2097 readers
204 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sounds like meta’s judge will have to invent a grand unified theory of fair use to excuse this.

I kept saying about various lawsuits that the important thing is discovery. Nobody knew all the idiotic shit these folks were doing, so nobody could sue them properly.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 57 points 4 days ago (11 children)

The "to minors" is a bit inflammatory. "Without any sense of discretion or propriety" is more accurate. It's not like you seed torrents for specific people. P2P just doesn't care if anyone is a minor or not, and downloading anything makes it available tl everyone anonymously. If you ever downloaded an R rated movie, you probably shared it with minors. The way it's written makes it sound intentional and predatory.

[–] jonhendry@iosdev.space 6 points 4 days ago (4 children)

@themeatbridge

P2P may not care but a mega-corporation ought to care about who they might be making the files available to. Using a P2P tool doesn't make it any better than putting it on an open FTP server at Facebook.com.

P2P isn't the target here so your knee-jerk defensive posture is misplaced.

[–] YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I mean, arguably an open FTP server would have been better because how many kids these days could actually use an FTP client?

[–] bitofhope@awful.systems 4 points 4 days ago

About as many as a bittorrent client, i.e. a rounding error.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)