this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
43 points (97.8% liked)
homeassistant
12072 readers
9 users here now
Home Assistant is open source home automation that puts local control and privacy first. Powered by a worldwide community of tinkerers and DIY enthusiasts. Perfect to run on a Raspberry Pi or a local server. Available for free at home-assistant.io
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I probably would have never started.
Everyone insisted that it was "easy". I've come to realize this community is heavily developer-based and completely unaware of what they average person would consider easy.
My system breaks all the time and I have to spend hours trying to just get it back up and running again.
I was never able to get the app to work.
If I could have all my money and time back I would have just stuck with "dumb" electronics.
This is applicable to every piece of advice I've gotten from lemmy and from reddit before it.
No, I can't work from home.
No, I don't have a raspberry pi and I don't know how one works.
I don't know what podcast you're talking about.
I have to fight to prevent my eyes glazing over when you say apk.
If you link me to something and it's just a list of the latest bugfixes without even a summary of what the fucking software IS, I won't understand.
Poor people are not scary. Some of them wear glasses too.
I don't even HAVE a PC, just a laptop that I carry with me.
You lost me at "terminal".
I don't know what any of those acronyms and abbreviations you're using mean.
Or the "step-by-step" guides that are missing a step. Or assume a bunch of knowledge. If you don't tell me I need to download a special compiler to install this thing, it's not step-by-step.
I found one the other day that failed to mention that I had to put some code in config to make it work. But they had put a screenshot of the code they used, just hadn't referenced it in the steps 🙄.
I've also seen one of the main devs respond to a user on GitHub saying that the bug they were seeing was not a bug because it was caused by the third-party system and "that's just how it is". Completely ignored the fact that the user could not achieve the intended behaviour from the integration. Was this information anywhere in the notes? Of course not.