this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
66 points (92.3% liked)

Steam Deck

14803 readers
141 users here now

A place to discuss and support all things Steam Deck.

Replacement for r/steamdeck_linux.

As Lemmy doesn't have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title

The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.

Some more Steam Deck specific flairs:
[Boot Screen] - Custom boot screens/videos.
[Selling] - If you are selling your deck.

These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.

Rules:

Link to our Matrix Space

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] kae@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The title doesn't seem to match the article. For nearly all the games the performance was identical or negligible.

There's lots of great things about 3.5, but bumping FPS significantly doesn't seem to be one of them, at least yet.

[โ€“] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 year ago

Most of the gaming performance advantages with SteamOS 3.5 tended to be in the lighter-weight (CPU bound) game titles while the GravityMark ray-tracing run showed some improvements worth noting there too.

Based on their conlusion I guess it really depends on the game in question.