this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
410 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

73705 readers
3637 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Cool man, fyi generally you want to avoid projecting assumptions on people and listen instead to their actual point. You're not arguing with caricatures, you're arguing with other people who might know as much or more than you do, so the preachy tone isn't doing you any favours in trying to convince people.

A big argument against this type of blocking is giving up private information to private entities to access content that can be tracked back to them is a huge risk for privacy, it doesn't matter if it's porn or something else, you can see it in the UK too where speech about Palestine is being blocked by the same ruling that is "protecting children". Someone else here also raised a good point, why is it on these websites to implement age verification and not on the state, when many of those websites aren't hosted in Florida?

But no you're not interested in a good debate, you just see a political choice that aligns with your views and anyone who has issues with the implementation, consequences, or any other issue (including a porn ban in general) is treated like the worst of the worst. "Surely this is a morally good thing, so all who oppose must be morally abhorrent", except this is exactly why the lawmakers prey on when they implement surveillance type shit all in the name of "protecting the children", they make it so arguing against it is seen as protecting abusers when the same resolution could be reached in a way that doesn't infringe on people's privacy.

load more comments (1 replies)