this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
541 points (92.1% liked)

linuxmemes

20707 readers
2355 users here now

I use Arch btw

Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
poopsmith@lemmy.world
zephyr@lemmy.world
541
I HATE electron (lemmy.ohaa.xyz)
submitted 1 year ago by Oha@lemmy.ohaa.xyz to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
174 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] inge@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

a huge chunk, most likely the vast majority, of Electron apps [...] are just wrapped web sites

[citation needed]

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] BlueBockser@programming.dev 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

If the question was "how many repositories on GitHub mention the word electron", your answer would be correct. As it stands, citation is still very much needed.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If the question was “how many repositories on GitHub mention the word electron”, your answer would be correct. As it stands, citation is still very much needed.

That is a valid citation. You can count yourself how many of those repositories are just for wrapping specific websites by random people. If you think I'm wrong, put your money where your mouth is and provide a citation yourself.

[–] BlueBockser@programming.dev 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The cited source does not prove your point, so it is not a valid source. If you make a statement, you go prove it. Until you do, I'm gonna assume it to be false.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

The cited source does not prove your point, so it is not a valid source.

Your laziness to count repos is not my fault. 🤷

If you make a statement, you go prove it. Until you do, I’m gonna assume it to be false.

OK, then I'm continuing to assume your statements are false because you can't even be bothered to provide a citation why mine is not valid. Bye then.