this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
122 points (99.2% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

4944 readers
544 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
122
British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak will give a speech this week in which he is expected to delay some of the government's policies to reach net zero emissions by 2050 (www.reuters.com)
submitted 11 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Archived copy

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 4 points 11 months ago (4 children)

"Abaaaht time I'm sick of hearing about this woke-vironment rubbish!"

That's what Rishi Sunak thinks of the electorate.

[–] FarraigePlaisteach@slrpnk.net 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think the electorate know what to expect every time they vote his party into power.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You'd think so, but I saw some poverty article in which some guy was being interviewed.

He was disabled, his 12 year old daughter was collecting from the food bank every day so they could eat, they had no heating, and kept having to fight for his benefits to not be cut.

Who do you reckon he was voting for next time? They've got the best plan for the economy, don't you know? Plus Corbyn wore the wrong tie for the queen or something.

[–] FarraigePlaisteach@slrpnk.net 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That’s a good point. I don’t know if I can blame them - there are powerful forces in the battles for hearts and minds. The Murdoch press is one example.

Disclaimer: I’m not from Britain though.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

However the thing about the battle for hearts and minds is it's much easier to win if the people you're trying to win over are not used to using them minds.

At some point being politically ignorant is not an excuse.

load more comments (2 replies)