But none have stepped up to condemn India for its alleged involvement in the June slaying on Canadian soil of a Sikh separatist, Hardeep Singh Nijjar. Why?

later,

Canada has yet to provide any evidence of India’s involvement in the killing. But . . .

How many guesses do we get for the question?

[–] posthexbearposting@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

India has a Hindu fascist government ethnically cleansing Muslims, Sikhs and other minority groups. It's really not a stretch that they organized the death of a Sikh separatist leader.

[–] reddit_sux@iusearchlinux.fyi 3 points 1 year ago

Just because there is evidence to the former doesn't mean it directly implies the latter.

Bush was not a dictator yet he misled a whole nation to fulfill his wet dream of killing Saddam Hussein, and indirectly gave rise to Daesh(ISIS).

Obama was awarded the Nobel peace prize but he did impugn the sovereignty of another nation to kill a known terrorist.

If what Canada is saying is true it is not any different than nations of five eyes have already been doing. All of them who supposedly uphold democratic principles when it suits them.

This is an ongoing investigation and remarks should await its results.

load more comments (3 replies)