this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
25 points (66.2% liked)

Technology

57609 readers
4212 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There’s not a single downside to requiring all material used in training to be licensed.

It destroys the open source/hobbyist sector. The only AIs that would be available for artists to use would be corporate-controlled, paywalled, and filtered. That's a pretty huge downside.

[–] BURN@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That’s not my problem

Art is not generated by machines. Nothing of value is lost.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ah, so you meant "there's not a single downside to me."

[–] BURN@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Nothing of value is lost. Generative AI does not create anything new.

It’s exclusively a benefit to artists

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Nothing of value to you is lost. We already know you don't care about other people, no need to keep repeating that.

[–] BURN@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

AI does not generate anything of value

I care about artists and the protection of their work. Not the AI models or their creators.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There are artists who use AI tools as part of their workflow. You don't care about them.

[–] BURN@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

And they can allow their art to be used to train AI. It just shouldn’t come at the expense of everyone else who wants to do things the traditional way.

Why should my work be open for anyone to use to train AI? I don’t care if it’s a hobbyist or an open model or google. I don’t want them using my work for training their models. Artists currently have rights over their work being used commercially, and I expect AI arguments to go that way as well. If it is to be used then it must be with the permission of the creator and a licensing contract written out. Art can be shared license free or AI permissive licenses, but would not be required to be.