this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
-21 points (25.6% liked)

conservative

920 readers
1 users here now

A community to discuss conservative politics and views.

Rules:

  1. No racism or bigotry.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn't provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. No spam posting.

  4. Submission headline should match the article title (don't cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  5. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.

  6. No trolling.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Some mentioned the other one was old. Heres a two-day old article on the same issue.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PizzaMan@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Once again lumping in suicides without clearly stating such

Suicides are a form of gun violence.

This data includes suicides, which a mag disconnector, chamber indicator, registry, etc won’t help with.

I never made that argument, so this is a strawman.

[–] sudo22@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Strawman? My friend these are gun laws in California. The state we're talking about.

[–] PizzaMan@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

My friend these are gun laws in California.

And the intent behind them, at least the ones you specified, is not to deal with suicides. They are to prevent accidents (which is a part of gun violence).

You are basically saying "these car seat belt laws don't do anything to prevent airplane crashes!". Yeah no shit, that wasn't the point of those laws.

[–] sudo22@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Dog I think you're losing track of the conversion. This post is about mag capacities, a measure trying to tackle gun murder. I started my comment talking about gun murders. I'm still taking about gun murders and related laws. You brought up suicide statistics

[–] PizzaMan@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You brought up suicide statistics

No, I brought up firearm deaths as a whole, which is a part of the problem. California has addressed it, which is why they have a lower firearm death rate.

I started my comment talking about gun murders.

And like I said, that is misleading. California's gun laws were added to reduce firearm deaths at a whole, so it is misleading to only go by gun murders.

[–] sudo22@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You're over simplifying the issue.

[–] PizzaMan@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] sudo22@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Lumping in 2 issues with 2 separate causes and solutions as evidence that (in this case) a mag capacity ban works, is an oversimplification.

Mag cap bans have nothing to do with suicide and weren't intended to. So bringing it up is just a distraction from the conversion this post is focusing on.

[–] PizzaMan@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You're the one who broadened the conversation:

"California regulations have done nothing to improve gun violence in their state when compared to less restrictive states like Texas. "

[–] sudo22@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Most people don't categorized suicide as violence. But even if you do, I made it clear in my next statements that I was talking about gun murders.