this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2023
69 points (92.6% liked)

Asklemmy

43944 readers
487 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What opinion just makes you look like you aged 30 years

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dolle@feddit.dk 14 points 1 year ago (6 children)

The Windows 98 UI was the pinnacle of desktop computing.

[–] gzrrt@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'd vote for Windows 2000, but the point stands. All it needed (in hindsight) was virtual desktops

[–] Hexorg@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

It was actually the result of quite a lot of research and analysis of human machine interaction. Then we let “pretty” take over “functional”

[–] Borgzilla@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Amen to that. Not sure what the heck happened over the last 25 years.

[–] dwindling7373@feddit.it 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For some reason the Start button got so bad I went from using it to run everything to actively avoid it and just run everything using... Everything, the software.

[–] erogenouswarzone@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I was 13 when Windows '95 came out. And there was so much hype around it. There were commercials on TV and newspapers and radio - seriously everywhere. And I remember using it for the first time and being so excited and then thinking "...stfw? How is this different than 3.1?" And realizing the OS doesn't really mean anything. But then we got a gateway with a gaming package a few months later, and that blew my nips off pretty good.

[–] e8d79@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't even care if it looks more modern. I just want a consistent UI in Windows.

[–] greybeard@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Don't worry, I'm sure with Windows 12 they will have a new UI design that fixes all the problems with the Metro interface. It wont replace it of course, it will just be another UI standard.

[–] SemioticStandard@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

It wont replace it of course, it will just be another UI standard.

That’s the great thing about standards, there’s just so many of them!

[–] e8d79@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

They already did that Metro (Windows 8) was replaced by Fluent (Windows 10 and 11).

[–] mustyOrange@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

I love how you can find ui from every windows version in even the newest stuff. To be fair, I dont envy microsofts position - developing an OS that gets used on modern devices to old industrial PCs cant be easy to update