Make their algorithms prefer posts from threads, so anyone wanting to reach a wider audience needs to move to threads
Add twitter like checkmarks that are only available for users of threads (they will say it is for security since they need to verify the idwntity of checkmarked people)
Add features that are not exposed on activity pub, so that you have to be on threads to use them (twitter did the same by for example not making polls available over API)
Intentionally make their activity pub slow and unreliable to make it look like other instances are broken and threads is fast and reliable.
Probably much more

[–] kenbw2@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As for how they ~~will~~ could suck users away

Meta have stated no such plans. I understand the distrust, I'm hesitant myself. But let's not spread inaccurate statements

[–] Azzu@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

There should be no benefit of the doubt with Facebook. They've proven time and time again how shitty they are.

If you let your shitty "friend" exploit you for the 100th time the friend is the problem, but you are also responsible because you keep letting them.

[–] reddwarf@vlemmy.net 4 points 1 year ago

Yes, the reasonable stance. Because that worked every time, all the time with commercial entities.

[–] jaaval@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately, realistically speaking there are no users here to suck. In a few days of existence threads already grew ten times bigger than all the fediverse combined.