People are worried that they'll embrace, extend and extinguish it. That is, join the fediverse, make Threads a better client than any of the existing ones until everyone uses their client, then use that extra reach to harm the fediverse.

I'm personally not that worried, because of who we are. We're a bunch of geeks with anarchist leanings, and so probably wouldn't switch to Threads anyway.

[–] Rusticus@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Please remember the example of Microsoft and open source office document formats. And in the early days of Internet Explorer with HTML. The risk here is that Threads will embrace the fediverse for a bit. Then they will incorporate features that are only available in Threads that will bleed users away from the open source options. All the while vacuuming up user data for profit while having distain for user privacy. Why would we want to allow them to cast aside the privacy for only one of our users? Are we not going to act like stewards for open source and protection of user privacy?

[–] pattmayne@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

This us exactly the threat. They'll start setting standards that other instances will be pressured to follow. Those standards will be ways to control the fediverse and make it a propietary data-gathering and sales/advertising platform just like everything else.

[–] SaveComengs@lemmy.federa.net 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I am worried because I want and we need non geeks to be on lemmy as well for it to be great.

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes. Diversity of thought is great. We can enjoy our nerdy echo chambers, but in the end we get outvoted IRL. We need to both know what's going on in the larger world, and we need some way to help educate. This theoretically allows the best of all worlds.

Conversely, I don't trust Facebook.

[–] SaveComengs@lemmy.federa.net 1 points 1 year ago

I really hope that we learnt our lesson with the other platforms and don't go blindly trusting mark fuckerburg with our federated platforms.

[–] pattmayne@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You think we can't get people to join lemmy unless our Genius Daddy Savior Zuck brings them in?

[–] Rokk@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not Zuck, but there is definitely a accessibility issue at the moment imo

[–] pattmayne@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Federation will become part of our cultural language and people will come over at that point.

[–] SaveComengs@lemmy.federa.net 2 points 1 year ago

that's the opposite of what I'm saying, I'm worried that if we federate with mark cuckerburg they would EEE our non tech savvy people away

[–] Addv4@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I enjoy a ton of hobbies where a lot of the people that know their stuff aren't particularly computer savvy. If they're not on my platform because it is too technically complex, I'm probably going to at least visit the more walled off platforms (not usually a fun experience).

[–] SaveComengs@lemmy.federa.net 1 points 1 year ago

yeah, I NEED a vibrant rain world community

[–] lagomorphlecture@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe? But a lot of people have exited reddit over the last month. Maybe not the average user but not the most hardcore geek anarchist either-they weren't on Reddit to begin with. Then there are the obvious reasons that a lot of people have left Twitter an those are the same type of people leaving reddit. So mastodon is probably more at risk than Lemmy but I don't think for a second that meta would not throw together a Lemmy competitor if they smell any money whatsoever in it.

Either way you run risks simply by interacting with threads, even if you interact accidentally. Their entire business model is to suck every last piece of data out of you that they can so they can sell in every way they can possibly think of to monetize it.

Since lemmyworld has no intention of blocking them I'm finding another instance to move to. Better safe than sorry with a company that has a horrific record on every single issue. And that way if they federate then back out, I won't be losing anything because I'll have never seen that content to begin with.

[–] Rusticus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Where have you read that lemmyworld has no intention of blocking Threads? I will leave as well if true.

[–] lagomorphlecture@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Someone in another thread somewhere said it was stated on mastodon.world that they would only block in if something happens. I don't remember what topic that was in so unfortunately I don't have a link for you. At any rate, silence also speaks volumes.

[–] Rusticus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I moved to lemmy.ml

[–] rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

We’re a bunch of geeks with anarchist leanings, and so probably wouldn’t switch to Threads anyway.

You know me, haha

[–] PixelProf@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I think the main fear would be that a few really cool communities naturally spark up, even if they're niche, and could long term create that fracture when you have to choose between keeping with that community (and any corporate backed extensions) or not.

[–] t_jpeg@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What about when/if the fediverse becomes mainstream? Sure, YOU wouldn't use threads but plenty of people will.

[–] pattmayne@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Nobody is suggesting that we destroy Threads. We just don't want to let it control the fediverse.