this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
12 points (100.0% liked)

People Twitter

4809 readers
1384 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying.
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] poopman_42069@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

https://www.fldoe.org/core/fileparse.php/20653/urlt/6-4.pdf The actual new standards can be found here. This is one bullet point in a sea of new standards,

Point SS.68.AA.2.3 "Examine the various duties and trades performed by slaves (e.g., agricultural work, painting, carpentry, tailoring, domestic service, blacksmithing, transportation). Benchmark Clarifications: Clarification 1: Instruction includes how slaves developed skills which, in some instances, could be applied for their personal benefit."

I don't think this is that terrible. It's not quite as absurd as "BLACKS BENEFITED FROM SLAVERY!" It seems worth mentioning that the skills developed during servitude may have contributed to their ability to integrate into society post-slavery. I mean, the whole paper is chock full of things that show slavery in a negative light. I don't think there were negative intentions in this. You can count on the news to write a good headline, though.

[–] Lux@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

The development of skills is entirely irrelevant when you think about what skills they would have had if they were never enslaved in the first place

[–] SickIcarus@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago

Shhh, you’re interrupting the circle-jerk!