this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
26 points (82.5% liked)

UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs

1239 readers
1 users here now

A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.


New to Lemmy?

See the Getting Started Guide


Want Disclosure?

Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.


Community Spotlight

Featured Posts and User Investigations


Useful Links


Community Rules


Other Communities

!uapmemes@lemmy.world


If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HM05_Me@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I've always been one to believe that the best way for the government to cover something of this magnitude is to leak details. Especially if you get the details into movies, TV, and other pop culture where you can then dismiss people's claims by saying it was just something they saw on TV. Even Stargate SG-1 had an episode (Wormhole X-Treme!) about allowing details to be included in a TV show for plausible deniability. On that note, X-Files had a triangle shaped craft that is fairly close to the one people believe to be real. I don't necessarily believe one way or another that leaks have been happening this way. However, I see a lot of people stating that aliens/UAP wouldn't look what we see in TV and movies, so leaks could definitely work.