this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
85 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59317 readers
4562 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Typical government move. Have a blatantly obvious questionable agenda to make spying on citizens easier, but tie it to something like children or “freedom”. Makes it easy to go “don’t you care about the children?!” This approach is so lazy it’s both insulting and nauseating.

[–] oroboros@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder how many children will be saved. Surely they've calculated this, given the high cost of freedom of information/speech being severely restricted.

[–] Johanno@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Probably none. Currently police has not enough men to even work through current data. Of course more data will fix this problem

[–] HidingCat@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Tangentially related to this, but this is something that should be talk about with legislation more often: Will the new law be enforceable? And at what cost?