this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
249 points (91.9% liked)

conservative

944 readers
30 users here now

A community to discuss conservative politics and views.

Rules:

  1. No racism or bigotry.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn't provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. No spam posting.

  4. Submission headline should match the article title (don't cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  5. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.

  6. No trolling.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://kbin.social/m/news@lemmy.world/t/488620

65% of U.S. adults say the way the president is elected should be changed so that the winner of the popular vote nationwide wins the presidency.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Patches@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Bro what? Am I reading this wrong? The Electoral College ensures rural votes have an outsized say compared to their population.

See almost every GOP state with maps redrawn in the last 4 years.

https://www.clarionledger.com/story/opinion/2020/12/02/electoral-college-needed-commentary-sid-salter/6428483002/

[–] kirklennon@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

On the whole, yes, the Electoral College gives a larger weight to rural voters by stealing it from urban voters. I was merely highlighting that it also effectively disenfranchises a lot of rural voters by consolidating all electoral power in roughly a dozen swing states. I think the argument that we need to give special privilege to rural voters is bogus, but even accepting the premise, the EC still sucks at that. The specious arguments made in its favor don’t hold up.

I think the argument that we need to give special privilege to rural voters is bogus

Yeah, nearly everyone would agree with that because the argument isn't about voters, it's about the states.