210

What games can you recommend that didn't get the appreciation that they deserved? (lemmy.world)

submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by FireTower@lemmy.world to c/games@lemmy.world

151 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've been recently been thinking about Arkane Studio's Prey which is a immersive sim, with a pretty good rogue like dlc, that probably has one of the strongest hooks of any game I've played. If you liked Halflife, System Shock, or Deus Ex it's definitely worth a play.

Are there any titles that might not have been commercially successful that you feel everyone should give a shot?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] morphballganon@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

Bomberman 64

Eternal Darkness

The Conduit

Halo Reach

[-] Lord_Logjam@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

Eternal Darkness is one of my favourite GameCube games. I feel like it might be long enough ago that they could do a remake with modern sanity effects.

And Halo Reach is my favourite Halo game, loved it.

[-] ClassyHatter@artemis.camp 3 points 9 months ago

Nightdive Studios (they, among other titles, remastered System Shock, which has received pretty good reviews) wanted to remaster Eternal Darkness, but Nintendo - who owns Eternal Darkness - doesn't want that to happen.

Also, the original developers of Eternal Darkness want to create a spiritual sequel, but that seems to be... an eternal project. Check out Shadow of the Eternals, if you want to follow that project. There's a gameplay video from like 2013 or 2014.

[-] Lord_Logjam@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Haven't they tried to get the spiritual successor off the ground on a bunch of different occasions? Are they still trying?

[-] ClassyHatter@artemis.camp 2 points 9 months ago

They have tried twice. And yes, they still want to make it happen. But last time I heard the team made a game they need to support for few years (some kind of online game), so it's going to take some time before they can try again.