661
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] WoodenBleachers@lemmy.basedcount.com 20 points 9 months ago

This happens on Mac as well btw. kexts are kernel extensions

[-] alonely0@programming.dev 24 points 9 months ago

You're not really changing anything, you're adding functionalities. Also, it appears that apple has limited their capabilities and doesn't even recommend them anymore, so it wouldn't be crazy if they just deprecated them in favor of system extensions, which sadly they don't call sexts. On the surface, kexts appear to be basically userland ioctls, which you have on windows too.

[-] Espi@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago
[-] AffineConnection@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Maybe about 4-5 years ago, I read through the source to find obscure undocumented features of a couple system calls that allowed me to write a detailed system/process monitor utility that does things that nothing else seems to know about.

[-] Tschuuuls@feddit.de 2 points 9 months ago

10+ year Mac user here. It's a bit sad but better for system stability. A lot of weird hardware and software used to just inject kexts instead of doing stuff in userspace. This can cause weird issues like battery drain, crashes etc. which are hell to debug as a "average user". I don't really miss running "Entre Check" to figure out weird issues :D

As a mac-first guy I wasn’t aware of mimicked (really bothers me this word is spelled with a ‘k’) functionality on windows. I simply mean that by adding a kext you are, by design, changing the code of the kernel. More of a particulars in speech thing.

this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
661 points (98.5% liked)

linuxmemes

19747 readers
2034 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS