this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
1138 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

58115 readers
3932 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago (10 children)

I'm genuinely floored this is the comment you were replying to. What does that even mean??!

[–] regbin_@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (9 children)

Saying training generative AI models on artists' work as stealing artwork.

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (8 children)

Because it literally is. If you knew the exact terms to get the the AI to recreate something in its training data, it could, 1:1. And if you ask it to create you something new, no matter what parameters you use it will look like a mess of garbage data. Generative AI is literally just art laundering just like how Language Models are writing laundering. We tend to use humanizing language but ultimately it's a machine which uses a bunch of dials and levers to determine how much % a work should resemble one piece in its training at a particular point of the work and how much it should resemble another in another. There's a reason why a lot of modern image bots have literal fucking watermarks all over their outputs. Because the images were flat out stolen.

The tech itself is pretty neat, you're essentially making a virtual brain and having it do useful work, but ultimately all the capitalists running these tools see it as is another method to bring the public under their exclusive and totalitarian control. We could have had a cool roboartist putting out new and unique works but instead we get people losing their job because an inept system hyped up by silicon valley fart huffers claimed it could do their work for free and it only gets worse as these AIs use their own garbage outputs as training data.

[–] not_gsa@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not reading all that, i'll assume you are wrong

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 0 points 11 months ago

This is the way.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)