this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
55 points (87.7% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5243 readers
392 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
55
Bill Gates take on Climate change (fortune.com)
submitted 1 year ago by Mistymtn421@lemmy.world to c/climate@slrpnk.net
21 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

This article is frustrating for me. Especially his take on trees. The article states the target goal/amount of trees planted would only reduce carbon 6%. Ok, but, it will reduce temperature. I live in WV near a state forest. It is typically 7°-15° F cooler at my house than in town. Additionally, the sun in the summer doesn't even hit my house until noon-ish, which significantly reduces my air conditioner consumption.

I chose to share this mostly for awareness. I am not especially fond of his perspective.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I get what you’re saying but to equate Gates to Musk is a bit much. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation actually does some good work. Musk throws tantrums with his money.

They should be taxed on 100% of that surplus money and we should use it to fund the programs we collectively agree to as a society.

The benevolence of billionaires isn't how we should be making these decisions. Its whitewashing the fact that they have dismantled our societies ability to govern itself through taxation and public spending.

Not to mention Bill Gates "philanthropy" has also had disastrous consequences.

So no. Fuck Bill Gates. He doesn't get a pass because his marketing team is more effective at whitewashing his wage theft than Elon Musk.