this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
190 points (93.2% liked)

3DPrinting

15541 readers
241 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: !functionalprint@kbin.social or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

edit: title word

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] halfempty@kbin.social 54 points 1 year ago (34 children)

A new California law was just passed which made "ghost guns" illegal. He was involved in ghost guns, at some level. It wasn't illegal before. Now it is. So now is when he got the boot.

[–] darkmogool@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago (29 children)
[–] i_shot_the_sherry@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Guns without a serial number. They are untraceable.

[–] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

Guns with a serial number are generally also untraceable, since the serial number is not registered to anyone in most states.

[–] mintyfrog@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Untraceable for what?

Almost all of them still use metal parts that can be x-rayed and still have barrels that leave ballistic fingerprints on bullets. Serial numbers don't make something GPS-tracked.

Untraceable in terms of ownership? There is no national firearm registry. Guns bought from FFLs require a NICS background check that is stored in an ATF database (of questionable legality), but private sale guns often don't require NICS so the database isn't an accurate registry of gun ownership.

And criminals scratch off serial numbers anyways.

And add on that any laws requiring serialization of privately-made firearms are only affecting nerds, not criminals. Criminals that are making guns because they can't pass a NICS background check will continue not adding serial numbers - because they're criminals.

[–] HughJanus@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Guns bought from FFLs require a NICS background check that is stored in an ATF database

NICS checks are not stored. Or at least they're not supposed to be. The firearms info is collected on a form 4473 in paper and kept at the FFL where the firearm is purchased.

But the ATF has been caught several times collecting these records and digitizing them in an attempt to create a registry.

load more comments (25 replies)
load more comments (29 replies)