this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2023
174 points (98.3% liked)

Asklemmy

43950 readers
596 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Personally I think not having karma limits is nice currently! I understand why they were used but grinding karma as a lurker on reddit was frustrating.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Never got the resistance to /s. Some people just struggle with understanding sarcasm, seems an easy way to avoid misunderstanding.

[โ€“] IverCoder@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The /s tag is important to easily recognize sarcasm, especially for neurodivergent people.

[โ€“] sup@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, sarcasm doesn't translate well in text. At times, it's easy to identify a sarcastic comment, and sometimes it's not clear. I have myself interpreted comments on differently before seeong the /s at the end. Changes the entire perspectives sometimes.

[โ€“] underisk@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Part of the humor in sarcasm is feigned sincerity.

It's like explaining the joke immediately after telling it. If you have to tell everyone its sarcasm, then you've done a bad job at deploying sarcasm.

[โ€“] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Except half the trick to deploying sarcasm is to use tone of voice, which you can't do in a text-only format. /s is like a shortcut for that. To use a face-to-face example, it's like saying something sarcastic with a straight face then cracking a smile to reveal you were joking all along.

Plus we're on the internet, people have some terrible takes that totally seem like they should be sarcastic but just aren't.

I guess I do get it though. /s does take some of the humor out of it, but it seems like more than a worthy tradeoff. People are just so hostile to it.

[โ€“] underisk@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago

Telling jokes in a text medium isn't new and sarcasm is frequently used without hackish writers rushing to reassure everyone that they were only kidding. If you can't do a sarcasm without an '/s' then just don't do one.

[โ€“] Daeraxa@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I think because for those who do understand it the /s just ruins the joke. So I don't think there is pleasing both sides.

[โ€“] MyMulligan@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Agreed. I can't tell you how many times in business I've seen a matter of fact text or email set someone off thinking the sender was some sort of monster. Try to add any humor and it can be 100% worse when it comes to interpreting.

I never had an issue with the /s used. Yes, I could read it as sarcasm 90% of the time before it appeared. But to me the written word should always add clarity. If the one commenting felt it should be used then so be it.