this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
394 points (92.3% liked)

World News

32076 readers
1138 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Guntrigger@feddit.ch 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

All you've done here is prove that you're ignorant. I suggest you look back and see that you're arguing two different points with two different people as well as attributing words to me that I didn't write.

If you actually read my post, l already answered the difference. Everything you mentioned has widespread environmental impact, particularly if people/corporations use those materials in bad faith. Personal choice to smoke a cigarette is not equivalent to implanting a hazardous object into the environment. And I think you know that. If you honestly can't see the difference, it's willful ignorance.

[โ€“] bear@slrpnk.net 1 points 11 months ago

You're right, I didn't notice you were a different person.

Everything you mentioned has widespread environmental impact, particularly if people/corporations use those materials in bad faith.

There's no greater environmental impact if a person chooses to insulate their own house with asbestos. My point still stands; draw me a clear distinction why a store can sell an individual person tobacco but not asbestos despite the fact that we know both cause long term lung damage.