this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
60 points (98.4% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5205 readers
773 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
60
Africa’s first carbon-removal plant stokes questions about responsible climate solutions (www.nbcnews.com)
submitted 1 year ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
24 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Blake@feddit.uk -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, I’m happy to support building large scale experimental establishments to test the theories, but that’s not what this is at all. This is a commercial installation in Africa, of all places. Why would the European research teams build a research facility so far away? That doesn’t make sense.

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's the difference between a large scale experimental establishment, and a first of its kind commercial experimental establishment?

As for location, presumably cheap land, power, lack of NIMBYs. Maybe tax incentives.

[–] Blake@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s not the first of its kind though. It’s just the first in Africa. There are already a bunch of these in Europe and America.

If the researchers are in Europe then it doesn’t work for the plant to be in Africa. I don’t know why you’re arguing such an obviously wrong position lol

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah scratch the first of its kind, wasn't thinking when I wrote that. Nevertheless, my point stands. For the technology to grow and develop we need PoCs to be constructed. Valuable data can be obtained from operating the PoCs that we wouldn't otherwise get.

If the researchers are in Europe then it doesn’t work for the plant to be in Africa.

In this age where everything is networked and teams can be distributed worldwide, what in the world does it matter if the plant is in Africa? If anything, it would be encouraging knowledge transfer and dissemination.

I don’t know why you’re arguing such an obviously wrong position lol

In most online discussions, that's exactly how the other person feels about you. We generally keep it civil by not saying it out loud, though.