this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
402 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

57651 readers
6336 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] arc@lemm.ee 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Gigacasting saves car companies money, it doesn't save car owners money. For the manufacturer it reduces their bill of materials and time take to assemble a vehicle. They might save a couple of hundred bucks. Possibly.

For the owner, it increases the risk that a small collision runs a fracture along the body of their car which is then basically impossible to repair and the entire vehicle is a writeoff. Castings could potentially have sacrificial points where some kinds of damage could be ground off and replaced with stamped metal but even if that were so, it's still less repairable than if the entire frame of the car were assembled of stamped metal.

[–] jimbolauski@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's more than a couple hundred dollars. Production time will drop from 10 to 5 hours per car. The tooling and multiple parts eliminated from large casts will save thousands.

[–] arc@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I doubt it is thousands since most plants are automated, but even assuming it were, it's the consumer who suffers when their car is basically disposable after a crash.

[–] jimbolauski@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If they were only saving 1% on costs I doubt they'd risk the bad reputation 10% makes it more appetizing.

[–] arc@lemm.ee 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

They'll risk their reputation for much less than you might think. Tesla are getting rid of physical controls to save a few bucks even though it has a serious impact on usability and safety. E.g. The new model 3 will remove indicator stalks and put buttons on the wheel making it all but impossible to safely and legally traverse roundabouts. I reckon there will be huge backlash on this especially in the UK and Europe.