this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
448 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

34513 readers
350 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Marxine@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

VC backed AI makers and billionaire-ran corporations should definitely pay for the data they use to train their models. The common user should definitely check the licences of the data they use as well.

[–] SixTrickyBiscuits@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That is essentially impossible. How are they going to pay each reddit user whose comment the AI analyzed? Or each website it analyzed? We're talking about terabytes of text data taken from a huge variety of sources.

[–] CannaVet@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Then it should be treated as what it is, an illegal venture based off of theft. I don't get a legal pass to steal just because the groceries I stole got cooked into a meal and are therefore no longer the groceries I stole.

[–] azuth@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Firstly copyright infringement is not theft. It's not theft because the grocer still has the groceries. It is a lesser crime which obviously hurts the victim less if at all in some cases.

A summary is also not copyright infringement, it's fair use. Of course copyright holders would love to copyright strike bad reviews (they already do even though it's not illegal).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)