Asklemmy

43950 readers

821 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

106

What games do you think should NEVER be remastered, because they're close to perfect as they are? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Que@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

105 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Any games where a remaster could never stack up to the original.

Inspired by this post, asking the opposite, what games do you think are worthy of a remaster: https://lemmy.ml/post/6091201

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Tiptopit@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh that could be remastered so good. Claim that you implement a 64 player battle royal mode which will never exist and in the end it's only two player with only pawns + king and you can rent the other figures through microtransactions.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com 2 points 1 year ago

You had me up til microtransactions :-p