My original comment never explicitly called out Israel nor Hamas, and for good reason. You're the one that claimed, and I quote, "read the article, there was no war crime". The line I quoted was pulled directly from the article.

I'm sure now you will be correcting your original claim, right?

[–] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

AH you're being pedantic to be pedantic. We were talking about Israel and you wanted to pretend we were talking about Hamas.

No, I will not be adjusting anything as we were clearly talking about Israel.

[–] stifle867@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, YOU were talking about Israel. My comment was "clearly" as general as I could make it. You replied to MY original comment, the onus is on you to understand the subject of my comment.

Instead of being intellectually honest about your mixup, you're re-defining the goal posts. You challenged me to find a single part in the article that would classify as a war crime and to also provide the exact war crime committed. I did exactly that, as requested.

[–] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you don’t think the r bombing of the building was a war come? You think it’s was fine?

I do but let’s see if you’re consistent or just being pedantic like I think

[–] stifle867@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just keep moving the goal posts, that's fine. I'm not jumping through any more of your hoops. You've proven yourself as intellectually dishonest. I submitted to one of your challenges, and when I met it you just doubled down. For me, there's no point continuing this discussion after this.

[–] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

I didn’t move the goal post. You’re he dishonest trying to pretend you were talking about Hamas.

You don’t want to continue because you were called out and now have to state your stance which will show you’re a house of cards.

It clear I support Israel. It’s clear you don’t. That’s fine, but don’t pretend otherwise.